Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Injector Offset from Flow Data

  1. #1
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    2,503

    Injector Offset from Flow Data

    I found a web page which had coherent injector static
    and pulsed flow (2.5mS/10mS) numbers. I worked these
    over in Excel and it appears to produce sane time-offset
    values. I am curious whether anyone here has "backed
    into" injector offset table numbers, for any of the listed
    injectors, and how their results compare.

    This data does not come with info on the drive voltage
    and the fuel pressure is 300kPa, not 4 bar, but it seems
    to bear out my notion that offset values -could- be
    obtained empirically.

    It is interesting that there seems to be no real trend by
    volume or make, to the offset.

    <attached .xls>

    I've got another "charity tune" coming up and I could use
    some proven-good 42# Lucas tables.

  2. #2
    Senior Tuner S2H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Schexnayder Racing - Arnaudville LA
    Posts
    4,387
    hey jimmy...I did a 2000 camaro with lucas 42's...
    I jujst used the injector spreadsheet....and it came out great...
    I had previously tuned the car cause it was mine....and guy froma local board bought it from me....
    he changed injectors to get ready for some superchargin...and he put lucas 42's on it...
    all I dis was change the injector IFR table and all his rims were still within +/-4..except for a few down at idle that went -6/-8
    and we did just a hair of WOT correction...it didnt take much...
    I was really amazed at how close it was

    I'm sure that I could have played with it a little and gotten the offset volts to make them all fall back in line...but teh offset table from the 2000 camaro was close enough...
    -Scott -

  3. #3
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Laurel, MD
    Posts
    1,020
    Jimmy,
    i'm really interested in this, i can see what you're doing with your math, but i'd like to know where the logic comes from. care to elaborate?

  4. #4
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    2,503
    The way I make out the injector offset as used by the
    PCM, it's a pulse width adder to correct for actuation
    time. It's how much pulse you can apply and still get
    zero delivered fuel, pretty much.

    So I take the 10mS/10mS (static) flow, and the 2.5mS/10mS
    dynamic flow, and extrapolate to the zero delivered fuel point
    (X-intercept) which gives me a negative time value and which
    the addition of a positive injector offset, would put to zero
    fuel at zero "desired" pulse width.

    This all seems nice, in theory, but now I'm looking for some
    real-world confirmation (not to mention any idea at all, of
    the test conditions underlying the table; system voltage
    in particular as that goes straight to current ramp time
    and time-to-delivery).